Compare A8 V2 vs Kobra 3 Combo
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | A8 V2 |
Kobra 3 Combo[BUY Kobra 3 Combo] |
| Buy Filament forAnet A8 V2 | Buy Filament forAnycubic Kobra 3 Combo | |
| Estimated price | $129,00 | $450,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anet | Anycubic |
| Release Year | 2021 | 2024 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 250x250x260 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 428x441x486 | 452x504x483 |
| Weight [kg] | 6,2 | 9,2 |
| Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Manual | Autimático |
| Filament End Sensor | NO | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 230 | 300 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 110 | |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 150 | 600 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA | PLA, PETG, TPU, ABS, ASA, Nylon, PC, PP, HIPS |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker | Anycubic Slicer, Cura, Orca Slicer |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | 32 bits | |
| Display | Display touchscreen 2,8'' | Touchscreen 4,3'' |
| Power Supply | 110/220V / 250W | 400 W |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | USB, Wi-Fi, Cloud |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Linux, Macbook |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-10 | 2024-06-27 |
| Release date | 2021 | 2024 |
| Extra features | The Anet A8 V2 is a Cartesian-XZ type 3D printer with a build volume of 220 x 220 x 250 mm, Ender 3 design and V-slot assembly. It has a 32-bit motherboard and touchscreen interface, promising ease of use. It uses open source firmware and has thermal failure protection. It stands out for its cable organization and the absence of a heated bed, focusing on energy savings and PLA printing. It comes with an external power adapter, aiming at greater safety, especially for beginners and educational use. | The Anycubic Kobra 3 Combo offers advanced features, including multi-filament printing with the ACE (Anycubic Color Engine) system, allowing for quick switching of up to four filaments. It features automatic bed leveling, nozzle clogging detection, and integrated filament drying during printing. The printer supports technical materials such as ABS, ASA, Nylon, and PC, thanks to the hotend that reaches 300°C and the heated bed up to 110°C. In addition, it has a 4.3-inch touchscreen and compatibility with various slicers such as Anycubic Slicer, Cura, and Orca Slicer. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | YES |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
| Hardware | 0.7 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| [BUY Kobra 3 Combo] |
Conclusion |
| In conclusion, the comparison between the Anet A8 V2 and the Anycubic Kobra 3 Combo highlights significant differences that cater to varying user needs and budgets. The Anet A8 V2 is a cost-effective entry-level printer, suitable for beginners or educational settings, boasting a basic set of features and compatibility limited primarily to PLA. It offers manual bed leveling and a more hands-on approach, which can be beneficial for users looking to learn about 3D printing fundamentals. On the other hand, the Anycubic Kobra 3 Combo stands out as a more advanced option, justifying its higher price with features like automatic bed leveling, a wider range of filament compatibility, and enhanced performance capabilities. Its innovative designs, higher maximum nozzle and bed temperatures, and quick filament switching make it suitable for experienced users or those with diverse printing needs. Ultimately, the choice between the two printers will depend on your specific requirements: the Anet A8 V2 serves as an affordable introduction to 3D printing, while the Anycubic Kobra 3 Combo is better suited for those seeking versatility and advanced functionality in their printing projects. |