Compare A8 V2 vs KP3S PRO V2
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Model | A8 V2 |
KP3S PRO V2 |
| Printing Material | Filament | Filament |
| Buy Filament for Anet A8 V2 | Buy Filament forKingroon KP3S PRO V2 | |
| Estimated price | $129,00 | $229,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anet | Kingroon |
| Release Year | 2021 | 2024 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 220x220x250 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 428x441x486 | 420x400x450 |
| Weight [kg] | 6,2 | 12,6 |
| Power Loss Recovery | NO | NO |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Manual | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | NO | NO |
| Bed type | Heated | |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 230 | 260 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 150 | 350 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA | PLA, PETG, TPU |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker | Cura, Orca Slicer |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Display touchscreen 2,8'' | LCD Mono |
| Power Supply | 110/220V / 250W | 300 W |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | USB-C / MicroSD / Ethernet |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-10 | 2025-03-18 |
| Release date | 2021 | 2024 |
| Extra features | The Anet A8 V2 is a Cartesian-XZ type 3D printer with a build volume of 220 x 220 x 250 mm, Ender 3 design and V-slot assembly. It has a 32-bit motherboard and touchscreen interface, promising ease of use. It uses open source firmware and has thermal failure protection. It stands out for its cable organization and the absence of a heated bed, focusing on energy savings and PLA printing. It comes with an external power adapter, aiming at greater safety, especially for beginners and educational use. | The Kingroon KP3S Pro V2 is a high-speed FDM 3D printer with Klipper firmware, ensuring fast and precise prints. It features linear rails on all axes, a Direct Drive extruder with a 9.5:1 gear ratio, and an efficient ceramic heater. It includes an inductive sensor for automatic bed leveling, a PEI magnetic bed, a built-in accelerometer for vibration calibration, and Wi-Fi, Ethernet, and USB connectivity for remote control. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 0.6 / 10 | 0.9 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Anet A8 V2 and the Kingroon KP3S Pro V2, it's clear that both printers offer a similar print volume but cater to different user needs and budgets. The Anet A8 V2, being the more economical choice, is suited for beginners or those who are just dipping their toes into 3D printing. It features manual bed leveling and a simpler build, making it more accessible but possibly limiting in terms of advanced features and performance. With a decent maximum printing speed and acceptable resolution, it may not meet the demands of more intensive or professional projects. On the other hand, the Kingroon KP3S Pro V2 is positioned as a more advanced option, reflecting its higher price point. With features such as automatic bed leveling, a Direct Drive extruder, and support for a variety of filament types, this printer caters to users seeking precision and speed in their prints. Its higher maximum nozzle and bed temperatures allow for a broader range of material compatibility, appealing to more experienced users or professionals. In terms of overall value, the KP3S Pro V2 offers better performance characteristics and advanced features, justifying its price increase over the A8 V2. For users prioritizing speed and versatility, it is the superior option. However, for those on a budget or those new to 3D printing, the A8 V2 still provides a viable entry point into the hobby. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on individual user needs, skills, and budget constraints. |