Compare A3V3 vs Photon M3 Plus
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Modelo | A3V3 |
Photon M3 Plus |
Buy Filament forGTMax A3V3 | Buy Resin forAnycubic Photon M3 Plus | |
Estimated price | $1210,00 | $430,00 |
Manufacturer | GTMax | Anycubic |
Release Year | 2022 | 2022 |
Print Volume [mm] | 320x320x340 | 197x122x245 |
Printer Size [mm] | 640x580x630 | 290x360x475 |
Weight [kg] | 11 | |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,05 | 0,01 |
Processor | ||
Display | Display touchscreen 3,2'' | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
Power Supply | 150 W | |
Connectivity | SD / USB / Wi-Fi | USB / Wi-Fi |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | |
Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-12 | 2023-01-19 |
Release date | 2022 | 2022 |
Extra features | The PROCORE A3v3 is an advanced 3D printer with a robust structure and Wi-Fi connectivity. It stands out for its aluminum extruder with Dual Gear system for precision and traction, and a movement system with machined parts. It includes a 3.2-inch LCD Touchscreen Display, Wi-Fi remote control and a Core XY movement system for greater speed and precision. It offers an Allmetal Volcano hotend that reaches up to 295°C, is compatible with various filaments and has an energy saving system, reducing consumption by up to 75%. | The Photon M3 Plus printer stands out for its automatic resin filling system, capable of keeping the tank always full. It offers wireless connectivity and support for the Anycubic Cloud app, allowing remote control and monitoring, including with an optional camera. Its 34-micron resolution, provided by a 9.25-inch monochrome LCD screen, ensures high-precision prints. Printing speed is remarkable, with a layer curing in 1.5 seconds. Other features include a large build volume, laser-etched build plate, and compatibility with a wash and cure station. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Hardware | 3.5 / 10 | 2.8 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 4 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 1 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
Conclusion |
In comparing the GTMax A3V3 and the Anycubic Photon M3 Plus, several key factors emerge that can guide your decision on which 3D printer to purchase. The GTMax A3V3, while being the more expensive choice, offers a larger print volume and a robust build structure. Its features include advanced connectivity options, precise dual-gear extrusion, and versatile filament compatibility, making it suitable for a variety of printing projects. The inclusion of power loss recovery adds an extra layer of reliability, especially for longer prints. However, its performance rating is relatively low, indicating that while it may excel in versatility, it might not be as efficient or capable in specific printing tasks. On the other hand, the Anycubic Photon M3 Plus, with its lower price point, showcases impressive printing performance. It boasts high resolution and fast curing times, making it an excellent choice for detailed prints. The automatic resin filling system is a standout feature, enhancing usability by minimizing manual intervention. Despite its smaller print volume, the performance metrics highlight its capabilities in precision and speed, which can be crucial for users focusing on detailed resin printing. When considering cost-effectiveness, the Photon M3 Plus appears to deliver a stronger value proposition due to its superior performance ratings and efficient printing capabilities. In contrast, the A3V3 aims to appeal to users who may prioritize larger build capacity and more flexible material usage. In conclusion, if you seek a printer that excels in precision and performance within a more budget-friendly range, the Anycubic Photon M3 Plus is the clear choice. If, however, your projects require larger print sizes and you value features like power loss recovery, the GTMax A3V3 may serve your needs better despite its higher cost. Ultimately, the decision should hinge on your specific printing requirements and priorities. |