Compare A3V3 vs M5
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | A3V3 |
M5 |
Buy Filament forGTMax A3V3 | Buy Filament forAnkerMake M5 | |
Estimated price | $1210,00 | $497,00 |
Manufacturer | GTMax | AnkerMake |
Release Year | 2022 | 2023 |
Print Volume [mm] | 320x320x340 | 235x235x250 |
Printer Size [mm] | 640x580x630 | 502x438x470 |
Weight [kg] | 12,6 | |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Enclosed printer | YES | NO |
Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
Bed type | Heated | Heated |
Power supply system | Bowden | Direct Drive |
Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 295 | 260 |
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | |
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 180 | 500 |
Filament holder | YES | YES |
Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG | PLA, PETG, ABS |
Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker e outros | AnkerMake Studio (macOS, Windows), Simplify3D, Ultimaker Cura, PrusaSlicer |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,05 | 0,1 |
Processor | ||
Display | Display touchscreen 3,2'' | Touchscreen 4,3'' |
Power Supply | 350 W | |
Connectivity | SD / USB / Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi, USB-C, OTA Upgrade |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Linux, Macbook |
Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-12 | 2024-07-08 |
Release date | 2022 | 2023 |
Extra features | The PROCORE A3v3 is an advanced 3D printer with a robust structure and Wi-Fi connectivity. It stands out for its aluminum extruder with Dual Gear system for precision and traction, and a movement system with machined parts. It includes a 3.2-inch LCD Touchscreen Display, Wi-Fi remote control and a Core XY movement system for greater speed and precision. It offers an Allmetal Volcano hotend that reaches up to 295°C, is compatible with various filaments and has an energy saving system, reducing consumption by up to 75%. | The AnkerMake M5 printer stands out for its impressive print speed, reaching up to 500mm/s. It features AI print monitoring, an integrated camera for creating timelapses, auto-leveling bed with pressure sensor, direct extruder, flexible PEI-coated build plate, and Wi-Fi and USB-C connectivity. Assembly is quick and easy, and the printer is designed to deliver high print quality and ease of use. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Hardware | 4 / 10 | 4.5 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 4 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 1 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Conclusion |
In comparing the GTMax A3V3 and AnkerMake M5 3D printers, we can draw several conclusions regarding their capabilities, costs, and features. The **GTMax A3V3**, although priced higher, offers a larger print volume and an enclosed design, making it suitable for various filament types and enhanced temperature stability during printing. Its robust build quality, advanced movement system, and higher maximum nozzle temperature highlight its potential for more demanding projects. However, the performance metrics suggest that while it excels in precision, its maximum printing speed is considerably lower than that of the AnkerMake M5, which limits its efficiency for time-sensitive tasks. In contrast, the **AnkerMake M5** stands out with its significantly higher printing speed, automated features, and user-friendly design. With a lower price point, it provides excellent value, particularly for those who prioritize speed and ease of use. The M5's capabilities such as AI monitoring and quick assembly also cater effectively to beginners and those looking for a straightforward printing experience. Overall, if budget is a primary concern and high-speed printing is a priority, the AnkerMake M5 is the better choice, offering great features at a lower price. However, for users needing a more robust, high-capacity printer capable of handling specific filaments and potentially greater precision, the GTMax A3V3 may justify its higher cost. Therefore, the choice between these two printers ultimately depends on the user’s specific needs and intended applications. |