Compare A3V3 vs Halot Mage
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | A3V3 |
Halot Mage |
Buy Filament forGTMax A3V3 | Buy Resin forCreality 3D Halot Mage | |
Estimated price | $1210,00 | $399,00 |
Manufacturer | GTMax | Creality 3D |
Release Year | 2022 | 2023 |
Print Volume [mm] | 320x320x340 | 228x128x230 |
Printer Size [mm] | 640x580x630 | 333x270x608 |
Weight [kg] | 12 | |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,05 | 0,01 |
Processor | ||
Display | Display touchscreen 3,2'' | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
Power Supply | 100 W | |
Connectivity | SD / USB / Wi-Fi | USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-12 | 2023-05-23 |
Release date | 2022 | 2023 |
Extra features | The PROCORE A3v3 is an advanced 3D printer with a robust structure and Wi-Fi connectivity. It stands out for its aluminum extruder with Dual Gear system for precision and traction, and a movement system with machined parts. It includes a 3.2-inch LCD Touchscreen Display, Wi-Fi remote control and a Core XY movement system for greater speed and precision. It offers an Allmetal Volcano hotend that reaches up to 295°C, is compatible with various filaments and has an energy saving system, reducing consumption by up to 75%. | The Halot Mage stands out with its easy-to-operate, space-saving MageArch hinged lid that filters 99.89% of UV light. It includes an integrated air purifier with a large, efficient activated carbon filter that is ideal for absorbing resin odors. Its ultra-stable Z-axis with dual linear rails ensures larger, more accurate prints with minimal wobble. Plus, it features a robust tempered glass LCD protector for durability and protection against impacts and resin spills. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Hardware | 4 / 10 | 4.5 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 4 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 1 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
Conclusion |
In this comparison between the GTMax A3V3 and Creality 3D Halot Mage 3D printers, several key factors emerge that can guide your purchasing decision. **Price and Value**: The A3V3 is a premium option, reflecting a more substantial investment compared to the more budget-friendly Halot Mage. The cost-benefit ratings indicate that while the A3V3 offers advanced features, the Halot Mage provides greater overall value for its lower price point. **Specifications and Performance**: The A3V3 excels in print volume, making it suitable for larger projects, while the Halot Mage, despite its smaller capacity, boasts superior performance metrics. This is particularly evident in its high maximum resolution, which contributes to finer details in prints. The A3V3 offers power loss recovery, a significant advantage in preventing print failures, whereas the Halot Mage lacks this feature. **Design and Usability**: Both printers come equipped with touchscreen interfaces, but the Halot Mage's design emphasizes ease of use and safety, thanks to its UV light-filtering lid and efficient air purification system. This makes it a preferable choice for users concerned about resin exposure and odor. **Additional Features**: The A3V3 stands out with its robust construction, dual gear extruder system, and high-temperature capabilities, which allow for versatile filament options. In contrast, the Halot Mage focuses on stability and user safety with its reinforced design. **Overall Recommendation**: If print size and advanced features are your top priorities, the GTMax A3V3 is the better choice, albeit at a higher cost. However, if you seek a balance of affordability, performance, and safety, the Creality 3D Halot Mage emerges as a compelling option. It ultimately caters to users who need precision and durability in a more compact design, bolstered by its impressive operational efficiency. Therefore, your decision should align with your specific needs and budget, weighing the importance of performance features against overall cost-effectiveness. |