Compare A3V3 vs Ender 7
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | A3V3 |
Ender 7[BUY Ender 7] |
Buy Filament forGTMax A3V3 | Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 7 | |
Estimated price | $1210,00 | $429,00 |
Manufacturer | GTMax | Creality 3D |
Release Year | 2022 | 2021 |
Print Volume [mm] | 320x320x340 | 250x250x300 |
Printer Size [mm] | 640x580x630 | 430x460x570 |
Weight [kg] | 17,2 | |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Enclosed printer | YES | NO |
Bed Leveling | Automatic | Manual |
Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
Bed type | Heated | Heated |
Power supply system | Bowden | Bowden |
Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 295 | 260 |
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | |
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 180 | 250 |
Filament holder | YES | YES |
Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG | PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS |
Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker e outros | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,05 | 0,1 |
Processor | Creality CR-FDM V.2.4.S1_V101 32bits | |
Display | Display touchscreen 3,2'' | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
Power Supply | 110/220V / 350W | |
Connectivity | SD / USB / Wi-Fi | SD / USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-12 | 2022-11-04 |
Release date | 2022 | 2021 |
Extra features | The PROCORE A3v3 is an advanced 3D printer with a robust structure and Wi-Fi connectivity. It stands out for its aluminum extruder with Dual Gear system for precision and traction, and a movement system with machined parts. It includes a 3.2-inch LCD Touchscreen Display, Wi-Fi remote control and a Core XY movement system for greater speed and precision. It offers an Allmetal Volcano hotend that reaches up to 295°C, is compatible with various filaments and has an energy saving system, reducing consumption by up to 75%. | Crealitys Ender 7 printer offers remarkable print speeds, utilizing CoreXY kinematics for precise and fast movement. With a 250x250x300mm build area, dual direct extruder, and custom hotend, the Ender 7 is capable of printing at high speeds, although quality may suffer on smaller prints. Assembly is relatively straightforward, but the machine is noisy and can get hot. Its true speed potential is most noticeable on larger prints, where it outperforms its competitors. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Hardware | 4 / 10 | 2.8 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 4 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Performance | 1 / 10 | 2 / 10 |
[BUY Ender 7] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the GTMax A3V3 and the Creality 3D Ender 7, we see two capable 3D printers catering to different user needs and budgets. The GTMax A3V3, being priced higher, offers superior features such as a larger print volume, automatic bed leveling, and a more advanced hotend with a higher maximum temperature. Its enclosed design provides a more controlled environment for prints, potentially leading to better results, especially when using materials sensitive to temperature fluctuations. Additionally, its ability to print at a high resolution enhances the quality of the final product. On the other hand, the Creality Ender 7 stands out for its impressive speed and relatively lower price point. It utilizes a CoreXY kinematic system, which allows for quick movements, making it an excellent choice for larger prints. However, users may need to compromise on print quality for smaller objects. The Ender 7's manual bed leveling might also deter some users who prefer a more streamlined setup process. Ultimately, the choice between these two printers will largely depend on individual priorities. If budget and speed are primary concerns, the Creality Ender 7 offers substantial value. However, for those willing to invest more for enhanced features, versatility, and overall better print quality, the GTMax A3V3 would be the preferable option. Each printer has its strengths, making the decision contextual to the specific needs of the user. |