Compare A3V3 vs Ender 3
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | A3V3 |
Ender 3[BUY Ender 3] |
Buy Filament forGTMax A3V3 | Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 3 | |
Estimated price | $1210,00 | $210,00 |
Manufacturer | GTMax | Creality 3D |
Release Year | 2022 | 2018 |
Print Volume [mm] | 320x320x340 | 220x220x250 |
Printer Size [mm] | 640x580x630 | 440x440x465 |
Weight [kg] | 6,62 | |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
Enclosed printer | YES | NO |
Bed Leveling | Automatic | Manual |
Filament End Sensor | YES | NO |
Bed type | Heated | Heated |
Power supply system | Bowden | Bowden |
Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 295 | 255 |
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 110 | |
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 180 | 180 |
Filament holder | YES | YES |
Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG | PLA, TPU, ABS, PETG |
Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker e outros | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,05 | 0,1 |
Processor | 8 bits | |
Display | Display touchscreen 3,2'' | Mono |
Power Supply | 24V / 270W | |
Connectivity | SD / USB / Wi-Fi | SD / USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-12 | 2021-04-13 |
Release date | 2022 | 2018 |
Extra features | The PROCORE A3v3 is an advanced 3D printer with a robust structure and Wi-Fi connectivity. It stands out for its aluminum extruder with Dual Gear system for precision and traction, and a movement system with machined parts. It includes a 3.2-inch LCD Touchscreen Display, Wi-Fi remote control and a Core XY movement system for greater speed and precision. It offers an Allmetal Volcano hotend that reaches up to 295°C, is compatible with various filaments and has an energy saving system, reducing consumption by up to 75%. | The Ender 3 V1 is a DIY assembly 3D printer, a sales leader since 2017, standing out for its cost-benefit. With a wide printing capacity, it has a CNC machined structure for precision and stability. It offers high-precision prints with low noise, thanks to its innovative V-profile and pulleys. It has a self-adhesive magnetic platform for easy removal of models and excellent adhesion. The Ender 3 heats up quickly, reaching 100°C in 5 minutes, ideal for agile prints. It includes protection against power failures, allowing you to resume printing after interruptions, saving time and material. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
Hardware | 3.5 / 10 | 0.5 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 4 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 1 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
[BUY Ender 3] |
Conclusion |
In conclusion, the comparison between the GTMax A3V3 and Creality 3D Ender 3 presents two distinct options catering to different priorities and budgets in the realm of 3D printing. The GTMax A3V3, while significantly pricier, offers advanced features like automatic bed leveling, power loss recovery, and a larger print volume, making it suitable for users looking for enhanced convenience and precision in their printing projects. Its higher maximum nozzle temperature also expands the range of materials that can be used, and the built-in Wi-Fi connectivity adds an element of modern convenience. On the other hand, the Ender 3 stands out as a highly affordable choice, making it accessible for hobbyists or those new to 3D printing. Its solid performance, despite its basic features, has earned it a reputation as a reliable workhorse. The Ender 3's DIY assembly approach may appeal to users who enjoy building and customizing their own machines. Ultimately, the decision hinges on the user's needs: if budget and simplicity are key factors, the Ender 3 is an excellent option. However, for those willing to invest more for greater capability and convenience, the GTMax A3V3 presents a compelling choice. Each printer has its merits, and the best option will depend on individual preferences, project requirements, and budget constraints. |