Compare A1 vs Photon M3 Premium
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | A1[BUY A1] |
Photon M3 Premium[BUY Photon M3 Premium] |
Buy Filament forBambu Lab A1 | Buy Resin forAnycubic Photon M3 Premium | |
Estimated price | $700,00 | $600,00 |
Manufacturer | Bambu Lab | Anycubic |
Release Year | 2023 | 2022 |
Print Volume [mm] | 256x256x256 | 123x219x250 |
Printer Size [mm] | 385x410x430 | 330x350x630 |
Weight [kg] | 8,3 | 19 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
Processor | ||
Display | Touchscreen 3,5 | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
Power Supply | 350 W | 150 W |
Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Bambu-Bus, Cartão Micro SD | USB / Wi-Fi |
Operating systems | Windows, Linux, Macbook | |
Date of registration in the system | 2024-07-17 | 2023-01-19 |
Release date | 2023 | 2022 |
Extra features | The BambuLab A1 printer features fully automatic calibration, multi-color printing with the AMS system, active flow rate compensation, quick nozzle change with a clip, active motor noise cancellation, a build volume of 256x256x256 mm³, a maximum extruder temperature of 300°C, and a heated bed of up to 100°C. In addition, it has high precision, a machine health management system and an intuitive 3.5-inch touchscreen interface. | The Anycubic Photon M3 Premium Printer features MSLA technology with a 10-inch monochrome LCD screen and 8K resolution, ensuring prints with fine details thanks to the 28.5 micron resolution. It has a generous build volume (219 x 123 x 250 mm), an intelligent cooling system for greater durability, and a laser-etched build plate for better adhesion. It offers dual air filters, reducing odors, and the promise of compatibility with the Anycubic Cloud app. Its design includes an Art Deco-style UV curved glass and an efficient leveling system for the build platform. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | YES | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Hardware | 5.4 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 4 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 4 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
[BUY A1] | [BUY Photon M3 Premium] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Bambu Lab A1 and the Anycubic Photon M3 Premium, both printers offer distinct advantages that cater to different user needs and preferences within the realm of 3D printing. The Bambu Lab A1 stands out with its larger print volume and advanced features such as the automatic calibration system, multi-color printing capabilities, and a superior connectivity setup, including Wi-Fi and Bambu-Bus. Its design focuses on user-friendliness, evident in its intuitive touchscreen interface and active noise cancellation, making it an excellent choice for those who prioritize ease of use and versatility in materials. Conversely, the Anycubic Photon M3 Premium excels in resolution and detail, benefiting from its MSLA technology and a high-definition monochrome LCD screen that produces incredibly fine prints. While it lacks the multi-color printing and some connectivity features found in the A1, it compensates with an efficient cooling system, odor-reduction dual air filters, and an aesthetically pleasing design. These factors make it a strong contender for users focused on high-quality, detailed resin prints. When considering the overall cost-to-benefit ratio, the Bambu Lab A1 is perceived as offering slightly better value due to its broader feature set and print capacity. However, for those specifically seeking the highest quality in resin printing at a competitive price, the Anycubic Photon M3 Premium presents a compelling option. Ultimately, the choice between these two printers should be guided by specific printing needs: users desiring larger, versatile printing capabilities may lean towards the A1, while those focused on fine detail and quality in smaller prints might find the Photon M3 Premium to be more suitable. Both printers present solid investments for enthusiasts and professionals alike, making the decision largely dependent on individual printing goals. |